contaminants

9 Natural Alternatives To Harsh Chemical Cleaners

Posted by on Apr 5, 2013 in childrens health, conserve, contaminants, Live Green, Womens Health

When spring cleaning season rolls around, chances are you’ll be breaking out your cache of cleaning products. But, did you know that many of the chemicals used in standard cleaners can be dangerous? In fact, some come with serious risks such as neurological damage and hormonal disruptions.

For example, two common sudsing agents called diethanolamine (DEA) and triethanolamine (TEA) can react with nitrates, which are often used as a preservative in cleaning products, to form carcinogenic compounds. Bleach and ammonia products create toxic chlorine gas when combined, and the chemical solvent butyl cellosolve aka ethylene glycol monobutyl ether is a suspected neurotoxin, meaning it can damage the brain and nervous system. Even fragrances can be dangerous, since many use the flammable ingredients butane and propane as propellants, which can be inhaled inadvertently and cause drowsiness, nausea, vomiting, hallucinations, and even asphyxia.

Natural Alternatives

Fortunately, there are many safe, more natural alternatives that you can use without sacrificing efficiency, and that don’t cost a fortune. Below are 9 types of common cleaning products, and their natural counterparts:

1. Bleach – Lemon juice
2. Abrasive cleaners – Baking soda mixed with water to form a paste
3. Glass cleaner – Vinegar and water
4. All-purpose cleaner – Soap and water
5. Bathroom surfaces and toilets – Vinegar, baking soda, and water
6. Floor cleaners – Vinegar and water plus some drops of peppermint, lemon, lavender, or another essential oil to add a lasting fresh scent
7. Wood furniture – Olive or vegetable oil and lemon juice
8. Disinfectants – Borax, vinegar, hot water, and liquid castile soap
9. Mold and mildew – 100% vinegar

Don’t have the time or desire to whip up your own home remedies? Check out some of these natural products instead:

• Power Herbal Disinfectant, www.earthpower.com
• Seventh Generation products, www.seventhgeneration.com
• Earth Friendly Earth Enzymes Drain Opener and Earth Friendly Shower Kleener, www.ecos.com
• Dr. Bronner’s Pure Castile (Liquid) Soaps, www.drbronner.com
• Aubrey Organics Liquid Sparkle, www.aubreyorganics.com
• BioShield Glass Cleaner, www.bioshieldpaint.com
• Earth Friendly Furniture Polish, www.ecos.com
• Bon Ami Cleaning Cake and Bon Ami Cleaning Powder, www.bonami.com
• Aroma Naturals essential oil aromatic room mists
• Greenridge Herbals’ aromatherapy soy candles
• Swiffer duster cloths (not the wet cloths, which are treated with a potentially irritating chemical)

Regardless of whether you choose to make your own cleaning products or decide to switch to a more natural store-bought product, by keeping safety in mind when you’re doing your spring cleaning, you put yourself and your family well on the way to living a healthier, happier lifestyle.

Kara Alcamo is a concerned mother, freelance writer and contributor to the Ross Feller Casey blog.

Learn More

Keep Kids Safe From Carbon Monoxide

Posted by on Dec 4, 2012 in ADD, ADHD, childrens health, contaminants, Live Green, Womens Health

We do it every day. As parents or grandparents, we send our youth off to public schools with the sense that they are safe for the day. But are they really safe?

In a past post, I discussed the dangers of radon in our public schools. While watching the Today Show this morning, I heard about another silent killer of our children.

We think they are safe. But are they really? 43 become ill in Atlanta, 42 in Georgia. Most states do not require inexpensive, carbon monoxide detectors. We really must ask ourselves, why?

Symptoms of Carbon Monoxide Poisoning

The symptoms of carbon monoxide poisoning can be very non-specific, often resulting in them being mistaken for flu or even food poisoning. The symptoms of CO poisoning can vary from person to person and can also depend upon the levels of exposure and how much carbon monoxide is breathed in. There are some common symptoms of carbon monoxide poisoning, some of which are listed below:

  • Red colouration of skin due to lack of oxygen
  • Shortness of breath
  • Nausea and vomiting
  • Headaches
  • Dizziness
  • Fatigue
  • Light-headedness
  • Weakness
  • Muscle fatigue and general fatigue
  • Chest pain
  • Loss of consciousness

It is easy to see how these symptoms can be confused with more common ailments such as flu or food poisoning, as they are very general symptoms. And because of the non-specific nature of these symptoms, many people each year continue to breathe in carbon monoxide obliviously, which can eventually lead to far more serious, long-term symptoms and damage, or even death.

There are some differences between the symptoms of carbon monoxide and the symptoms of flu, and you should make sure that you are aware of these differences as they may help to save your life. Unlike flu, carbon monoxide poisoning does not produce feverish symptoms or glandular swelling. Although you may suffer symptoms of general fatigue you should not experience the same aching sensation with carbon monoxide as you often would with flu. The symptoms of carbon monoxide poisoning may also come and go, or seem more severe on some occasions than on other. Flu, on the other hand, is usually continual until it has passed. With carbon monoxide poisoning you may find that your symptoms worsen at particular times of the day or in particular places.

Carbon monoxide poisoning usually peaks in winter time, when people burn various types of fuel in order to keep warm. The causes of carbon monoxide poisoning include the incomplete burning of carbon-based fuel and materials as well as faulty equipment and poor ventilation. This makes the colder season a far greater risk period than other times of the year, as it is during the cold season when most people in crease their use of fuel burning equipment.

It is important to always stay vigilant for any signs of carbon monoxide poisoning, particularly if you use carbon-based fuel or equipment that could post a CO risk. If several members of the family begin to display similar symptoms, it is vital that you seek assistance immediately. The same applies if you notice that pets are starting to show signs of illness as well.

You should also ensure that you minimise on the risks of carbon monoxide poisoning by taking precautionary steps, as these could save you from serious risk of death or permanent damage.

However, even if you have taken precautions such as CO detectors and regular equipment checks, this will not make you immune to CO poisoning, and it is still vital that you remain aware of the symptoms and seek assistance should you have any doubts or worries.

http://www.silentshadow.org/symptoms-of-carbon-monoxide-poisoning.html

Learn More
Are you voting to save the environment? 0

Are you voting to save the environment?

Posted by on Nov 5, 2012 in alternative energy, conserve, contaminants, Live Green, Womens Health

Well are you voting for the environment? Here are 12 green questions to consider before you vote if you are in any way concerned about the environment.TreeHugger.com ‘s post: All of these should be considered before we cast out vote. I think these are some great things to bring up at any future debate.

12 Green Questions I’d Ask If I Were Moderating a 2012 Presidential Debate

  1. Given the forecasts for sea level rise over the coming decades, and the increased risk from natural disasters this brings to our coastal communities and several of the nation’s largest cities, what would you have the federal government due to help states and cities prepare for rising seas?
    baldeaglebluff/CC BY-SA 2.0
  2. Current proposals for an international climate agreement mandate emissions reductions that many climate scientists say are insufficient to mitigate the problem; how would you have the United States participate in a future international climate agreement and what is your view on the current state of talks?
  3. A majority of economists in general and all ecological economists call the failure to price carbon a market distortion, and addressing this would level the playing field for a host of technologies; what method of pricing carbon would your administration favor: cap-and-trade, a fee-and-dividend approach, a carbon tax, something else?
  4. The US military and intelligence agencies have been consistently warning that climate change has the potential to be a particularly strong destabilizing force in multiple areas of the world; how would you direct the military and intelligence community to prepare for this? Would preparing for climate-change induced conflict be a priority for your administration?
  5. Similarly, numerous reports highlight the security risks arising as the Arctic melts, as nations and corporations equally (US ones included) vie for newly accessible resources; what would your administration propose to ensure that resource competition doesn’t become resource conflict, and how would you regulate oil exploration so that the environment of the Arctic and the communities dependent upon it aren’t hurt?
  6. Another with a military connection: The US military has been increasingly supportive of efforts to expand its use of renewable energy, both domestically and in overseas operations, yet Congress has recently attempted to curtail this, second-guessing military leaders; what would be your administration’s policy towards military requisition of, deployment of, and research into renewable energy technology?
    Official US Navy Imagery/CC BY 2.0
  7. A recent European Union report found that shale gas drilling using hydraulic fracturing technology created a high risk to human health and the environment, due to potential for water contamination and other factors; how would your administration regulate the fracking industry on a national level, or would you leave such regulation to the states?
  8. NASA climatologist James Hansen has said that exploitation of the Canadian tar sands means “game over” for the climate, due to the massive amount of stored carbon contained in this unconventional fossil fuel source, yet both Governor Romney and President Obama have essentially giving support for efforts to expand its importation into the United States. What’s your position on increasing use of unconventional fossil fuels such as tar sands?
  9. When you look around the world numerous countries have stated specific renewable energy goals, using different time frames. For example, India aims for 20 GW of new solar power over the next decade; Scotland is trying for 100% renewable power by 2025; Denmark wants 50% of its electricity by 2020; several small island states are on track to be 100% renewably powered soon. What sort of national renewable energy target would your administration propose?

    1. © Google
    2. Half a century ago the federal government was instrumental in creating the interstate highway system, with the national rail infrastructure languishing in the intervening time and the United States far trailing Europe, China and Japan in high-speed rail development. What sort of role do you think high-speed rail and other railway revitalization efforts have in the future of US transport, and how should the federal government support this?
    3. Similarly, electric cars are widely seen as the future of individual motorized transport, yet they are currently limited in part by lack of charging infrastructure; what role do you think the federal government should have in ensuring that motorists have as frequent opportunity to charge electric vehicles as they now have in filling their cars with gasoline?
      Millions Against Monsanto/CC BY 2.0
    4. The United States remains one of just two major industrialized nations in the world that does not mandate the labeling of genetically modified ingredients, even as surveys show an overwhelming majority of Americans would support labeling; do you believe GM ingredients should be labeled? If yes, should such labeling be left to the states? If no, why shouldn’t they be labeled?

    Be sure to read the entire post here: http://www.treehugger.com/environmental-policy/12-green-questions-i-would-ask-2012-presidential-debate.html

Learn More
More Autism Research. The Cause Might Not Be Genetics 0

More Autism Research. The Cause Might Not Be Genetics

Posted by on Jun 29, 2012 in ADD, ADHD, childrens health, contaminants, eat for health, food, Live Green, Womens Health

More Autism Research. The Cause Might Not Be Genetics

Autism might not be just in the genes. More research is pointing to environmental triggers. Cases of Autism, ADD, ADHD, and many more learning disabilities are on the rise. Researchers are finding there are many things that have become common in most households, could really be harming our children.

Our kids are our future, and it seems, without really knowing it, we are setting them up for failure!

At least 10 products or additives can be directly linked to any or all learning disabilities in our children.

Just what are the top 10 suspects research found?

Not surprising, lead is number 1 on the list. Lead can be found in paint, toys, water pipes, and yes, even in water! Studies have shown that expectant mothers, and even those who are trying to get pregnant, should avoid lead at all costs! This means that lead could cause damage, even before your child is born. If you are at all concerned about lead in your home. Have it tested. Many states offer help in eliminating lead from homes.

Next on the list is Mercury. Not as common, but still a danger. The most common place Mercury is found in fatty fish. Surprisingly, this can also be found in high-fructose corn syrup. Mercury should also be avoided by expectant moms.

PCBs are third on the list. These can be found everywhere. The number 1 source is from fatty meat. PCBs are stored in fat cells. Trimming the fat from meat, and choosing more lean cuts will decrease the PCBs we are exposed to.

 

Organochlorine Pesticides most common, DDT, come fourth. These are now banned, but some are still in use to control insects in farming areas. Organochlorine exposure comes mostly from conventional snap beans, tomatoes, and watermelons. It is best to buy organic, or grow your own. Pesticides are still widely used in many farming communities.

Car pollution is another suspected cause of autism and other learning disabilities. Number 5 on the list. High levels can be found in homes where traffic is extremely heavy.

Brominated Flame Retardants come in sixth. Where this is found my be a surprise. These flame retartants can be found in furniture, electronics, certain sodas and sports drinks, and even household dust.

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) is a chemical that is produced when meat is charred, or burnt. Other common places to find these are coal-tar-based driveway sealants and anti-dandruff shampoos, cigarette smoke, and mothballs.

Another pesticide, Organophosphate makes number 8. Chlorpyrifos, an organophosphate insecticide, is still one of the most widely used farm chemicals in the U.S. Banned from residential uses, this pesticide is still legal in agriculture, and residues have turned up on apples, bell peppers, cranberries, kale, grapes, peaches, and dozens of other foods.

Hormone-Disrupting Chemicals comes ninth, Bisphenol A (BPA) and plasticizing chemicals called phthalates are prime suspects linked to socialization and aggression problems in children, along with stunted growth, learning disabilities, and lower IQ. These chemicals are used in hundreds of everyday products, including soaps, shampoos, cleaners, and air fresheners.

Finally, at number 10 is non stick chemicals used as coatings on cookware, but can also be found in waterproof clothing, and certain stain-repelling fabrics used in carpeting and furniture.

This list should tell us something. Most of these suspected causes of learning disabilities and autism are man made. Getting back to nature by eating organic, and using natural alternatives to these products where the suspects are found is a solution to going green and helping to insure the health of our children.

Learn More
Fracking, Contaminated Water, People are Suing! 2

Fracking, Contaminated Water, People are Suing!

Posted by on Jun 5, 2012 in alternative energy, childrens health, conserve, contaminants, fracking, Hydraulic Fracturing, Live Green, Womens Health

Fracking, Contaminated Water, People are Suing!

What would you do if your water that was once healthy, and drinkable, suddenly turns into a toxic health hazard? Well call the lawyers and sue! Yeah, that will help, right? It may help put more focus on the problem, but will it solve anything? Are they going to suddenly stop the hydraulic fracturing process? I think not, whatever these law suits costs big oil, it most certainly won’t stop them.

Let’s go over it again; Hydraulic Fracturing is the process to harvest natural gas from the Earth. The process involves injecting a water/sand/and?? who knows what else into a very deep hole in the ground. During this process, the Earth’s core is literally filled up with holes, letting this toxic soup spew into the cracks. Where does the toxic water go? Well, some soaks into the ground where it will contaminate the soil. some will also end up in the water supply.

There is currently no way of knowing what all is in fracking water, so there is no way to decontaminate it. Water filters will help, but there are many unknowns contained in fracking water.

Law suits will draw more attention to the problem, but it may not solve a thing. The people bringing the suit may get a big payoff, and that might help them some, but by now, not only is their water contaminated, but the people may even be ill from exposure. So the cash they get, may just cover some of the medical bills that will no doubt begin to pile up, if they haven’t already.

Kudos to the plaintiffs, I sincerely do hope they get something. Shame on “Big Oil” for destroying our drinking water, our land, our food supply, and our families.

Want to jump on the law suit band wagon? Well here is the official settlement site.

Thanks to The Watchers for bringing this to our attention.

Learn More

BP Oil Spill, The After Effects

Posted by on Apr 18, 2012 in alternative energy, contaminants

If you think the effects of the BP Oil spill were not that bad, think again.

BP Oil Spill Aftermath: Eyeless Shrimp, Clawless Crabs and Fish with Oozing Sores

Al Jazeera just published an astonishing report on the after-effects of the BP oil disaster, and it’s not pretty. There are an alarming number of deformities in sea creatures: mutated shrimp, fish with sores and lesions, eyeless crabs and more. It’s unlike anything local fisherman have ever seen.

How bad is it?

The effect that the oil spill and its reckless cleanup has on sea life is frightening, damning and sad. Here’s a list of deformities that Al Jazeera found in its report:

  • Shrimp with tumors on their heads
  • Shrimp with defects on their gills and “shells missing around their gills and head”
  • Shrimp without eyes
  • Shrimp with babies still attached to them
  • Eyeless fish
  • Fish without eye-sockets
  • Fish without covers on their gills
  • Fish with large pink masses hanging off their eyes and gills
  • Crates of blue crabs, all of which were lacking at least one claw
  • Crabs with holes in their shells
  • Crabs with shells that have no spikes or claws or misshapen claws
  • Crabs that are dying from within
  • The fishermen, scientists, and seafood processors who talked to Al Jazeera are all in unison: They’ve never seen this before. Some have worked in and around the Gulf for over 20 years, and most have seen thousands and thousands of fish. This is the first time they’re seeing the mass mutation and destruction of seafood.And it’s not just the obvious deformities. Tests of the oysters that wind up on our plates have shown elevated levels of nickel and vanadium according to the Natural Resources Defense Council. And the jury’s still out on arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury levels.

Be sure to read the entire post here.. Its really scary what is happening in the Gulf. But will BP have to fix the rest of their mess? They sure should!

Learn More